|
| ||||||
![]() | ||||||
|
Óêðà¿íñüêà áàííåðíà ìåðåæà | ||||||
|
<< back
© Tatiana TUR (USA), “Vechirniy Kyiv”(“Evening
Kyiv”), March 16th, 1996 Holocaust. Truth about Babyn Yar. Documental research (Part
six) THE EVIDENCE OF THE SOVIET
PRESS DURING THE OCCUPATION OF KYIV I USSR the
communist party had an absolute control upon mass media, the main of which were:
TASS, which represented the creative work of journalists; Soviet Informational
bureau, through which the party informed “the Soviet man”; the Informational
bureau of People’s Commissariat of Foreign Affairs – the mouthpiece of the
government, which reported news abroad and to the western
allies. Taking into consideration the difficulties
during the war there often appeared contradictions between those organizations
about information. Because of the mistakes and because all the time SOMETHING
was suppressed, in particular about Babyn Yar, it could be seen how the untruth
was created, to learn about the state secrets and to come to a truth. The
analysis of the chronology of the reports of that three Soviet press services
gives an opportunity to find out: when, how, who and why boomed the fib about
the tragedy of Kyivans on the Jewish cemetery, and after some time – of Jews in
Babyn Yar. Although in this
reports lie and truth are in pell-mell, they are an important historical source.
However, firstly, nowadays the documents in archives are difficult to find and
it is unknown, who brought them there and are they falsified or not. Secondly,
the reports of the press services are made hurriedly, and not all of them are
concerted. Thirdly, the workers of archives often limit an access to them.
Fourthly, the most important is that the reports of press are hardly to
counterfeit, because different periodicals, often outside the Soviet
Union. THE FIRST MEMORY ABOUT BABYN
YAR IN THE PRESS An important
information about Babyn Yar is possible to find in “Krasnaia zvezda”(“Red
star”). In 1993 already the archives of
Kyiv didn’t want to publish for revising the duplications of this paper for the
1941. Probably, that’s because the paper had to screen and acquit the
terrible failures of the Red Army.
However the revision of the duplications from 1942-44 give an explanation about
who and why invented a fib about the war tragedy in Babyn
Yar. The first memory
about Babyn Yar in the Soviet press we have found in the article “Kyiv”, written
by Illia Ehrenburg on the occasion of the first anniversary of occupation of
Kyiv (“Krasnay zvezda” 27.IX.42). In a comparative large
article it is said hardly not with one sentence about the “the most horrible
slaughter” in all history of humanity: “A year ago on the cemetery in Babyn Yar
55 thousand inhabitants of Kyiv were shot from machineguns. Since then no day
passes without execution. On the walling of the walling of the city it is
possible to read: “For the act of sabotage 300 hundred criminals were shot by
the German military
authorities. Not long ago two women in
Darnytsia were hanged for harbouring of Red Army
soldiers”. Firstly we should
pay attention to the phrase of I. Ehrenburg “in the cemetery in the Babyn Yar”.
Probably it is not just a language or literal error. In his article
Ehrenburg contradicts Molotov, who
definitely pointed out in his note nine months ago that the military shooting
was held on the Jewish cemetery. The contradiction between Molotov and Ehrenburg
about the place of slaughter of more than 50 thousand citizens of Kyiv had
several reasons, that’s why it needs more detailed
elucidation. (To
be continued) |
|
| |
|
Óêðà¿íñüêà áàííåðíà ìåðåæà | |
|
© 2004-2012 Site is a property of Corporation "Chumackiy Shliah".All rights reserved. |